Anthropisches Prinzip. Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. Log inRegister. State Street Scribe by Jeff Wing Why does the country seem to become more interestingly spiritual as you move from east to west? Out east you have Plymouth . In what is becoming to be one of the worst misuses of science since electronics ended up in Sammy the Singing Sea Bass, defenders of „Intelligent Design“.
|Published (Last):||1 February 2014|
|PDF File Size:||6.86 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.57 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Theismus, Atheismus, Primzahlen, Unsterblichkeit, das Universum Hilbert’s Hotel Diskussionsforum zur Unendlichkeit: AdminGlobal ModMod.
Sorry, I answer in german, because I don’t know the relating english terms.
anthropisches Prinzip – English translation – German-English dictionary
Das anthropische Prinzip zielt nicht zwingend auf die Beliebigkeit von Logik und Naturgesetzen. I have a quite different belief to offer: If one insists on the conditions under which things develop and searches for the cause therof, such searching and insistence will never end until one comes to something that is unconditional.
Then the principles anthropissches self-transformation will become clear. There are those who say that the semi-shadow penumbra is conditioned by the shadow, the shadow by the body, and the body by the creator. However, the creator is uncreated and all forms materialize by themselves, just as the great T’ai Chi is ‘self-so.
Hence everything creates itself through the integration of yin and yang, without the direction of any creator. Since all things create themselves, they are pprinzip determined. This athropisches the immortal model of the universe.
I favor number 1, while recognizing that I do not understand the ultimate nature of God. As far as I am concerned there is only one Truth, and if we honestly seek it, science, religion and philosophy all have the possibility of bringing us to a point priznip confluence where that Truth is evident.
When we view reality through the lens of our human understanding we filter, group and categorize that information with inherent limits imposed by our nature, intellect, and senses. I’m betting that in the process we discard, or simply fail to notice, a lot of what is real.
Anthropic principle – Wikipedia
As a result a true understanding of the nature of the universe might only be achievable antrhopisches the seemingly divergent lenses of science, philosophy and religion are unitedly focused on the question.
In my eyes you forget an important possibility that might be well known for all the programmers beneath us: Who said we were the first try of nature to create life? Science has proven that nature nathropisches able to adopt to given conditions and I’m pretty sure that the same happened to us!
The multiuniverse is the only solution Our universe is just a bubble in a boiling pot of billion and billion bubbles It is the only solution unless you dont believe in God Even though I am not a religious person I must admit I was embarassedreading some scientific articles on this topic Scientists claimed ” Since God does not exist then multiuniverse is the solution ” It seems to me that Science usein this csse,a dogmatic approach.
Previous Topic Index Next Topic. Print Topic Switch to Threaded Mode.
You are not logged in. Display more indicators by tradingest Today at Square root rule by jcl Today at What are you working on?
Page 5 of 5.
Pappenheimer Senior Expert Registered: PadMalcom Serious User Registered: AlbertoT Serious User Registered: Following a similar same kind of logic one might assign some sort of chance to impossible events which eventually should be possible as long as enough time would have passed.
To some extent such speculations do not make much sense.
Don’t forget that we do not actually know whether life can nathropisches in other forms than currently exist on our planet. We assume life will be linked to planets that more or less have the same conditions as ours, but that assumption might be wrong. Perhaps there’s nothing inevitable about the coming into existence of life. The multiuniverse is the only solution Our universe is just a bubble in a boiling pot of billion and billion bubbles It is the only solution unless you dont believe in God Even though I am not a religious person I must admit I was embarassedreading some scientific articles on this topic Scientists claimed ” Since God does not exist then multiuniverse is the solution ” It seems anthropiscehs me that Science usein this csse,a dogmatic approach They do not use a dogmatic approach, they simply are aware of how all deities are invented by mankind itself with no substantial proof to back their existence up.
The good old Spaghetti Monster God argument is valid, until whichever God has been scientifically proven to exist. At some point it really makes no sense to be overly respectful towards one religion in particular or religions as a whole. They’re a cultural trait. Also note how encountering more intelligent and more culturally and technologically developed life forms anthropischez us humans could easily be mistaken for Gods in comparison.
With that anthropjsches mind encountering God-like entities might not have an actual chance of zero, but I’m convinced we’re not going to find any of the currently ‘described and popular’ deities.
Simply because they really do not exist. It’s like trying to find Frodo. Switch to Threaded Mode. Add to your Watched Users.