Addendum to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual: Scoring of the EORTC QLQ- CPAL. Mogens Groenvold and Morten Aagaard Petersen on behalf of the. PDF | On Apr 1, , Mogens Groenvold and others published EORTC QLQ- CPAL: The new standard in the assessment of health-related. This study aimed at developing a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires in.
|Published (Last):||5 November 2018|
|PDF File Size:||16.27 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.74 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Important dimensions not covered by the questionnaire were identified. Although significant overlap exists between both tools, there is a marked difference in the aspects of QoL assessed. You can help adding them by using this eeortc.
QLQC Stata module for scoring of the EORTC QLQ-CPAL
European Journal of CancerVol. A comparison between both questionnaires in terms of development, erotc, validation and use was conducted. A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care.
Each instrument has unique strengths and weaknesses and choice between these tools is dependent on the investigator and study needs.
RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers. Depending on the research questions, it may be supplemented by additional items, modules or questionnaires. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about. Four scales were shortened without reducing measurement precision.
Future studies should directly compare these two tools and validate their use through a number of administration modes. General contact details of provider: More qlq-c15-apl this item Keywords data management ; questionnaire scoring ; Statistics Access and download statistics.
European Journal of Cancer42 155 – Scoring, organization and item format are different; however, response options and recall period are the same. Main research site Explore Bristol Research.
EORTC QLQ-CPAL | EORTC – Quality of Life : EORTC – Quality of Life
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. When requesting a correction, please mention this item’s handle: Both tools cover the core items relevant to patients with advanced cancers and can be supplemented with disease-specific tools. Shorter quality-of-life QoL assessments are beneficial for palliative patients as they reduce burden associated with completing personal, and at times stressful, questionnaires.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Niels Qlq-c15-lal Bruun Aarhus University.
Item response sortc methods were used to shorten scales.
A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care”. Help us Corrections Found an error or omission? See general information about how to correct material in RePEc. A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care ‘ European Journal of Cancervol.
European Journal of Cancer. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the “citations” tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation. Niels Henrik Bruun, You can help correct errors and omissions.
QLQC15: Stata module for scoring of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL
Download full text from publisher File URL: A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care Research output: Windows users should not attempt to download these files with a web browser. N2 – This study aimed at developing a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires in oncology, for palliative care research.
We have no references for this item. More about this item Keywords data management ; questionnaire scoring ; Statistics Access and download statistics Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
This allows to link your profile to this item. The study included interviews with 41 patients and 66 health care professionals in palliative care to determine the appropriateness, relevance and importance of the various domains of the QLQ-C The purpose of this article was to conduct a review of studies utilizing these wortc palliative-specific QoL instruments, their development and their relative strengths for use in advanced cancer patients.
Corrections All material on eortv site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. This module should be installed from within Stata by typing “ssc install qlqc15”. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here.